Cohesive Sets: Countable and Uncountable

نویسنده

  • RICHARD A. SHORE
چکیده

We show that many uncountable admissible ordinals (including some cardinals) as well as all countable admissible ordinals have cohesive subsets. Exactly which cardinals have cohesive subsets, however, is shown to depend on set-theoretic assumptions such as V=L or a large cardinal axiom. The study of recursion theory on the ordinals was initiated by Takeuti and then generalized by several others to all admissible ordinals. The analogy with ordinary recursion theory has been quite striking and particularly so for the theory of degrees of unsolvability. Many major theorems, especially ones about recursively enumerable degrees have been successfully generalized to all admissible ordinals. Thus for example, Sacks and Simpson [3] have introduced the finite injury priority argument into a-recursion theory to construct two incomparable a-r.e. degrees. Indeed even an infinite injury argument has been successfully adapted to this general setting to prove that the a-r.e. degrees are dense for every admissible a [5]. In general it seems fair to say that although the proofs are often somewhat different and usually more complicated than those in ordinary recursion theory, the theorems about degrees (at least the r.e. ones) seem to carry over. The situation changes drastically when one turns from degrees to sets even if one restricts one's attention to the recursively enumerable sets. Of course the phenomena of nonregularity poses many interesting problems along these lines [4], [7] but a more striking example is provided by the notion of maximal set. (An a-r.e. set is maximal if and only if its complement is a-infinite but cannot be split into two a-infinite pieces by an a-r.e. set.) It is a well-known theorem of Friedberg that such sets exist in ordinary recursion theory [2]. On the other hand, Lerman and Simpson [1] have shown that there are no maximal r.e. sets for any uncountable admissible. Finally, if we drop the requirement of recursive enumerability, the situation becomes even further removed from that of ordinary recursion Received by the editors December 11, 1972. AMS (MOS) subject classifications (1970). Primary 02F27; Secondary 02K05.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Utility of the Uncountable

In my lecture at the 2011 Congress on Logic, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science in Nancy, France, I spoke on an additional axiom of set theory — the Proper Forcing Axiom — which has proved very successful in settling combinatorial problems concerning uncountable sets. Since I have already written a exposition on this subject [43], I have decided to address a broader question in this art...

متن کامل

Borel Sets and Countable Models

We show that certain families of sets and functions related to a countable structure A are analytic subsets of a Polish space. Examples include sets of automorphisms, endomorphisms and congruences of A and sets of the combinatorial nature such as coloring of countable plain graphs and domino tiling of the plane. This implies, without any additional set-theoretical assumptions, i.e., in ZFC alon...

متن کامل

(Un)countable and (non)effective versions of Ramsey’s theorem

We review Ramsey’s theorem and its extensions by Jockusch for computable partitions, by Sierpiński and by Erdős and Rado for uncountable homogeneous sets, by Rubin for automatic partitions, and by the author for ω-automatic (in particular uncountable) partitions.

متن کامل

Countable Structure Does Not Have a Free Uncountable Automorphism Group

It is proved that the automorphism-group of a countable structure cannot be a free uncountable groupi. The idea is that instead proving that every countable set of equations of a certain form has a solution, we prove that this holds for a co-meagre family of appropriate countable sets of equations. Can a countable structure have an automorphism group, which a free uncountable group? This was a ...

متن کامل

On quasi-amorphous sets

A set is said to be amorphous if it is innnite, but cannot be written as the disjoint union of two innnite sets. The possible structures which an amorphous set can carry were discussed in 5]. Here we study an analogous notion at the next level up, that is to say replacing nite/innnite by countable/uncountable, saying that a set is quasi-amorphous if it is uncountable, but is not the disjoint un...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010